Facial Measurement

Reviewed May 27, 2026

What is Nasofrontal Angle?

The nasofrontal angle is the wedge that opens at the nasion, where the forehead steps back into the bridge of the nose. Taken on a side profile between glabella, nasion, and pronasale, it captures the depth of the radix and the slope of the dorsum in one number, and it does most of the work in deciding whether a profile reads soft or strong.

What is **Nasofrontal Angle?**

How It's Measured

How is the nasofrontal angle measured?

The nasofrontal angle is a three-point angle taken on a side profile, with the apex at the nasion where the forehead steps back into the nasal bridge.

  • G (glabella): the most prominent point of the soft-tissue forehead, between the brows
  • N (nasion): the deepest point of the soft-tissue concavity at the root of the nose
  • Prn (pronasale): the tip of the nose, anteriormost point on the nasal contour

Drawing tangent lines from N up to G and from N down to Prn produces the wedge that quantifies how cleanly the forehead steps back into the nose.

Female profile with dorsum raised, nasofrontal angle 144.1 to 141.5 degrees
Figure 1

Raising the nasal dorsum tightened the nasofrontal angle from 144.1° to 141.5°. Same face, same lighting, same framing.

Why It Matters

Why does the nasofrontal angle matter?

The nasofrontal angle sits at the boundary between two large facial blocks, the forehead and the nose, so a small shift at the nasion changes how both of them read. In rhinoplasty practice the angle is a primary driver of the radix lie, and Powell and Humphreys' aesthetic ideal of 115° to 130° is still the most cited Western reference (Leong & White, 2006). Below that range the profile reads as a deep, sculpted radix with a strong dorsum. Above 140°, the transition flattens and the nose looks as if it begins higher on the face than it actually does.

The angle is also a sex-dimorphism signal. In a survey of preferences for nasion position on White North Americans, Mowlavi and colleagues found that a soft nasal dorsum with a deeper nasofrontal angle reads as feminine, while a prominent radix with a shallow angle reads as masculine and was rated unattractive on female profiles (Mowlavi et al., 2004). A Powell-style 120° target therefore works well on a male nose but tends to over-masculinise a female nose, where the literature centres closer to 130° to 135° (Uzun et al., 2014); (Goel et al., 2023).

One more thing makes this measurement useful in surgical planning: the nasofrontal angle can be changed without touching the tip. Both the glabellar limb and the dorsal limb meet at the nasion, so the angle opens or closes when the radix is augmented or the dorsum is lowered, while tip projection and rotation stay where they were (Mowlavi et al., 2004). The cards and table below give the specific values by population.

115°–130°

Men

130°–135°

Women

120°–140°

Typical Range

Figure 2

Fig 2. These ranges shift with ethnicity and the position of the nasion. See the table below for population-specific values.

Measure Yourself

Measure your nasofrontal angle in seconds

Drop a side-profile photo to see your measurement against the normative band for your demographic.

Drop your profile photo here

or click to upload, PNG / JPG, side profile

Coming soon

Your photo never leaves QOVES servers and is deleted after measurement. Final widget design + captcha + rate-limited microservice wire in progress.

Demographic Variants

Ideal Nasofrontal Angle by Demographic

Ideal nasofrontal angle ranges shift by population. Each row links to the paper that established the measurement for that group.

Demographic

Ideal range

Source

Caucasian (Powell/Humphreys ideal)

115°–130°

Leong & White, 2006

Caucasian women, observed average

~134°

Mowlavi et al., 2004

Turkish women

133.16° ± 8.88°

Uzun et al., 2014

Turkish men

123.85° ± 13.23°

Uzun et al., 2014

North-East Indian women

134.63°

Goel et al., 2023

North-East Indian men

129.43°

Goel et al., 2023

Get Yours Measured

How QOVES Can Help

Send us your photos and preferences
1

Send us your photos and preferences

We use this to personalize your analysis feedback to what is realistic and achievable.

We perform your facial analysis
2

We perform your facial analysis

Using a number of computer vision tools, measurements and research data we quantify what is and isn't working with your look.

See where you sit
3

See where you sit

Get realistic feedback and visualization morphs showing you what you can change and how it would look.

Your Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

The most cited Western reference, attributed to Powell and Humphreys, places the ideal nasofrontal angle at 115° to 130° (Leong & White, 2006). Healthy populations sit slightly above that, with Caucasian women averaging around 134° and men around 130° (Mowlavi et al., 2004). Treat the Powell range as a phenotype-conditional surgical target, not a universal ideal. Values north of it can still read as elegant on a feminine profile.

Women tend to carry a more obtuse nasofrontal angle than men by 5° to 10°, with the deeper angle producing a softer transition from forehead to nose. Across populations, female means cluster around 130° to 135° (Uzun et al., 2014: 133.16° ± 8.88°; Goel et al., 2023: 134.63°) while male means cluster around 123° to 130° (Uzun: 123.85° ± 13.23°; Goel: 129.43°). The same anatomical feature read as masculine on a man can read as too strong on a woman, which is why surgical targets are sex-specific.

A "deep" nasofrontal angle in clinical language means a more obtuse value, a shallower notch at the nasion where the forehead flows smoothly into the nose with little step-down. Mowlavi and colleagues report that a soft dorsum paired with a deeper nasofrontal angle reads as feminine, while a prominent radix with a shallow angle reads as masculine. A deep angle on a male nose tends to be corrected with radix augmentation in rhinoplasty (Mowlavi et al., 2004).

The nasofrontal angle is measured on a side profile as the three-point angle G-N-Prn, with the apex at the nasion. A line is drawn tangent to the forehead through the glabella, a second line tangent to the dorsum through the nasion to the pronasale, and the angle between them quantifies the depth of the radix (Mowlavi et al., 2004). Some authors split the angle into upper and lower components with a true horizontal at the nasion; here we use the full G-N-Prn convention.